Evan Roberts, University of Minnesota
Sociologists have long recognized that endogamy is a fundamental indicator of the degree to which different ethnic groups have assimilated. Endogamy serves as a measurement of social acceptance and integration. High intermarriage rates suggest relations between members of different social groups are considered socially acceptable. Moreover, endogamy is not only a measure of assimilation but a factor of its reproduction. With this in mind, we study marriage patterns to document anti-German prejudice around World War I (WWI). Prior to the war, German-Americans were the largest, most economically successful, socially accepted immigrant group in the United States. We compare the marriage patterns of German-born and German-descended young adults, with other immigrant groups and their descendants in the United States between 1910 and 1930 to measure the extent of prejudice against German-Americans in the aftermath of WWI. Using the 1910, 1920 and 1930 complete-count census data we measure endogamy and exogamy to native-born Americans for Germans and other major immigrant groups. We find a general trend towards lower endogamy, and greater exogamy with the native-born over the two decades. However, in counties sustaining higher casualties in WWI, exogamy to the native born fell for German-born and German-descended men. Correspondingly endogamy (in-marriage) rose for Germans in these counties, counter to the general trends across both time and space. In counties with below-average levels of casualties German inter-marriage with native-born Americans was not affected. We extend our analysis by showing that in the same high-casualty areas in which German exogamy fell, there was also a tendency towards lower public-sector employment for German men. By 1930 marriage and employment of Germans was similar to other immigrant groups. Taken together, our results show a broad hostility towards German-Americans after WWI, but one that was concentrated in areas most affected by the war, and limited in time.
No extended abstract or paper available
Presented in Session 245. Marriage and Partner Selection